Resolved: Not all legislative enactments are entitled to a ‘presumption’ of constitutionality… None where interests are protected.

May 9, 2021 § Leave a comment

In the law of the United States, the presumption of constitutionality presumes that all statutes are drafted in accordance with Federal and state constitutional requirements. The party challenging the constitutionality of a statute bears the burden of proof, and any doubts are resolved against that party. If there are two reasonable interpretations of a statute, one of which is constitutional and the other not, the courts choose the path that permits upholding the statute.[16]

This global universal rule which is premised upon something false when interests of the individual legislators are involved such as districting.

NO presumptions regarding districting or almost all regulations of voting which lessen the chances of a citizen voting.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

What’s this?

You are currently reading Resolved: Not all legislative enactments are entitled to a ‘presumption’ of constitutionality… None where interests are protected. at Wednesday in the Age of Reason-Munchausen (1988).

meta

%d bloggers like this: