Lawyer to Law School leash Law Professor.

April 1, 2019 § Leave a comment

The lawyer, not citing any disciplinary rule, hectors a law school to leash/muzzle an employee who happens to a law professor.

http://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/2019/03/30/ex-police-chiefs-attorney-calls-law-school-rein-criminal-law-expert/

https://www.courts.state.hi.us/docs/court_rules/rules/hrpcond.htm

 

Intentional interference with contractual relations

At common law, a defendant is liable to pay damages in tort for actions intended to interfere with the plaintiff’s contractual relations with a third party.

In an intentional interference claim, the burden is on the plaintiff to prove the elements of the claim rather than on the defendant to prove that its acts were justified. To prevail on the claim, plaintiff must prove four elements: (1) that a valid contract existed, (2) that defendant had knowledge of the contract, (3) that defendant acted intentionally and improperly,  and (4) that plaintiff was injured by the defendant’s actions. United Truck Leasing Corp. v. Geltman, 406 Mass. 811, 812, 551 N.E.2d 20 n. 6 (Mass. 1990).

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/intentional_interference_with_contractual_relations

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

What’s this?

You are currently reading Lawyer to Law School leash Law Professor. at Wednesday in the Age of Reason-Munchausen (1988).

meta

%d bloggers like this: